Archive for May, 2012

Currently Playing: Diablo 3

Diablo 3 is a really marvelous game that is flawed in some areas. It tries so hard to be better than it’s predecessors and on most account achieves it but there are other areas where they shouldn’t have touched. There are many changes that anyone who has played any previous Diablo games will see when they start playing Diablo 3. Skill trees are gone and replaced with rune systems. Special monsters with abilities are of more importance than bosses now. And most importantly the sense of item hunt has disappear and replaced by an Auction House.

Just to start things off, I really do not like the idea of the Auction House. As I said before, it takes away the item hunts and sense of achievement when you get something better than your items. I understand that Blizzard had to add the auction house but I’m not sure if it was really there for gamers in mind. From what I understand, the auction house main purpose is to fight against gold farmers. You are allowed to either use in-game gold or real money to buy items in the auction house. The latter being not available currently but I would like to know how the situation of the auction house changes with real money involved. As of right now, you can get most of your character’s items from the auction house for really cheap. Sure you still have to play the game to level up your character and progress through each of the game’s four difficulty but you don’t have to worry about getting items. The strange thing is that you can buy the item, say a chest armor, for 10,000 gold. Then after you wear it and you level up with it, you find another chest armor with better stats for your current level for 10,000. Well you can buy it and then sell off the old chest armor for 10,000. Someone else is bound to buy it again from you. This continues the forever trend of the auction house that I came to notice. It is cheating using the auction house but I feel that Blizzard has the auction house for a reason. There are times when you feel super powerful because you just bought two brand new powerful axes from the auction house. The sense of power you get from using the new items are amazing. One moment you may be struggling with a boss or a special enemy and another moment you’re blasting through them with full health. The thing that I really miss is that this eliminates the feeling of an achievement when you buy these items. You didn’t get these items, someone else did. The items you find seem meaningless to the items you bought. Sure I may find a Legendary item or some powerful rare item but those are very rare chances. Why play through the same areas hoping to get a specific armor or weapon when you can look specifically for the item you want in the auction house? This is one of the main reasons why I haven’t played as much as I use to.

The eliminations of the skill tree system is a pretty risky idea that Blizzard has played. At first it is very strange that you can pick different skills anytime. It makes you wonder if you’re even getting more powerful with the skills. In theory you aren’t getting more powerful. The skills you unlocked in the later levels may be weaker to you than the skills you already had when you started the game. This new system gives the player choices. You pick what you want to use for a certain situation and test out if it is a good pick. It is similar to load outs in that each boss or special enemy is a match that you need to figure out. You may need to use a health healing attack, one that increases your attack speed, or one that slows down enemies. It is all different for different kind of situations. On the easier difficulties it doesn’t matter what skills you use as you’ll mostly be using skills that you’re comfortable with. On harder difficulties however, you need to pick certain skills that makes sense for those situations. It gives a sense of strategy that is balanced out by the aforementioned auction house item buying.

The last thing that I notice that is changed in Diablo 3 is the way how special monsters are handled. For every step up in difficulty, they have an additional new ability they can use. On Inferno, they have four abilities that can all be used at once. Abilities are most likely chosen random for every special monsters which means every special monsters may have a way to kill you quickly. It makes these monsters harder than most of the bosses in Diablo 3. I believe that is why Blizzard has put more emphasis on these special monsters than the bosses. Sure with bosses you’re still bound to get better items or rarer items. However in Inferno, killing these special monsters gives you a boost that will help you get better items. This boost lasts for 30 minutes and it can be stacked. So you can theoretically kill multiple special monsters before going to a boss and killing him. Though it is possible, Inferno is a pain in the ass to even fight a special monster.

Anyways, Diablo 3 is an awesome game. The changes that Blizzard made helped introduce Diablo to a new generation and a wider audience. However I feel that some of the changes made Diablo 3 lose some of its charms. The sense of gratification that is received from an item hunt is now gone in place of an Auction House. Because of that, I keep wondering why I keep playing the game. It is fun to level up and kill a room full of monsters but I’m not sure how much it could last. I’m hoping Blizzard may patch something that will make it stand out more but as of now I haven’t gone back to Diablo 3 in a while. I don’t think I will until I hear some changes are made or the economy of the auction house is balanced when the paid auction house is released. So this game is worth a try but it is not worth hyping about as I thought it was before release.

Witcher 2 Finished!

Witcher 2 has got to be one the most spectacular games I’ve played in a while. I’m not sure why I held off from playing it ever since I got my new graphics card last summer just for this game. Usually there would be other big name RPGs like Skyrim and Mass Effect 3 to play. Witcher 2 was always being put up back into my back log. Now that I have some chance to actually dive into playing it, I have to say that playing Witcher 2 is an amazing experience.

The first thing that I noticed was how beautiful the graphics were. I had an older graphic card when I started playing this game and I felt that I wasn’t getting the full experience so I bought a new card just for this game. That’s really saying something when I wanted to buy a new graphic card just so I can get a better experience. It means that the graphics really add to the gameplay experience. From the moment you see the sun shine through the forest in Witcher 2, you know that you’re in for a spectacular delight. All the locations are unique to each other and there is always a sense of scale to how large the world of the Witcher is. Character designs are also well done with very high detail character models. Each armor that you put on Geralt (main character in the game) looks unique to each other. There are zippers, pockets, and hoodies that makes each armor feel unique and give a sense of style to the character. This is a game for graphic whores and I’m glad to have bought my new graphic card for this. Even now I plan to rebuild my computer to play this game a second time with a better processor. I am now in High Settings but I want to try to get it to it’s “Uber Settings.”

Speaking about the second play through, the game literally wants you to play it more than one time. CD Projekt Red has made the game so that each locations that you visit is unique to the choices you make in the game. For example, there will be one big choice that you decide at the end of chapter 1 which will determine which location you go to. Each locations has it’s own set of quests and dialogues that you will not see unless you made the other choices. It is a very risky and costly idea for CD Projekt Red to do this. Just imagine the development time it took to make this new location with quests and dialogues that some players won’t even see. Other developers are afraid to do this since they want players to see everything they made in the game. That is why games like Mass Effect 3 or Fable don’t have decisions that really diverge as much from the story. Even though choices matter in those games, you’re mostly bound to see the same people and same quests as everyone. Even the choices in this game are very grey to the point that it was taking me a good time to figure out what I want to do. There is no right or wrong answers in the game and the story will progress but the choices you make matters a lot. The worst thing is that you can tell what will happen if you make a certain choice. Knowing that makes decisions harder since you’re not sure if you should kill off this character who if you let live might be the cause of an end of a civilization. And if you kill him then you just lost the reason for the cause you’re fighting for. Each choices matter and you can tell that there is never a true right choice. Other games like Mass Effect and Fable both go the other route in saying how any choice is the right choice but you decide how your character is developed. However in Witcher 2, you’re deciding how the fate of the world will be and not so much as how your character will be.

Questing in the game is short but very fun. There are only a few handfulls of side quests and they are all unique to each other. Some will even help out with the main quests which was a nice touch. The interesting idea about the quests in Witcher 2 is that it doesn’t really hold your hands as your completing it. The quests may sometime not even tell you where to go or who to talk to. It may just say “Go find X so you can do Y” or “Read the notes and solve the riddle to find the location of X.” Unlike other RPGs these days, Witcher 2 will force you to read the notes you uncover throughout the exploration to solve some quests. RPGs these days hold your hands so much that they show you where you have to go and even point out who or what you have to kill. It is a nice departure to figure things out by myself and I felt better when I do complete the quests.

As for the story, it took me a while to get use to it. You play as Geralt of Rivia who is a witcher with amnesia. Yea I know classic RPG cliche right? Anyways most of the game you’re trying to figure out what happened to your friends and even figure out why certain things are happening. This may have been a good time to introduce the world of the witcher to new players but like the quests, CD Projekt Red doesn’t hold your hands in the story. Things are already happening before you even start playing as Geralt. You’re as lost as Geralt and the story wants you to put the pieces all by yourself. Many things have happened in the past game and there might be hints of it. The only thing I know about the past game is the stuff I read from Wikipedia but I highly suggest players to read that before playing the game. It helps you get a sense of who some characters are and what they have been doing. I felt like the story was similar to Game of Thrones. There are really not much similarities but the style is the same. Both the book and game starts off with things like wars and deaths that have happened already. Characters may talk about it but you don’t really know the full detail of the event until you read further into the story. There is even a feud with different Kings trying to take over each other lands similar to the book. Though they may be similar in certain beats of the story, the story is still unique to itself.

The last thing I wanted to talk about is the gameplay. It has been a while since I’ve played a game with a combat system as fluid looking as the Witcher 2. The last game was probably Batman: Arkham City and I still believe that game still have the best fighting mechanics. Witcher 2’s combat is fast but you need to strategize before every battle early in the game. Once you’re surrounded by 2-3 enemies, you’ll most likely die. You have to set up traps, use bombs, sharpen your sword, drink potions, and use your signs (magic) before/during every battle. The battles only get easier once you level up and add new abilities. The animations in combat for Geralt has got to me some of the most impressive animations I’ve seen. He moves very fluidly from one enemy to another. He will do jumps, cartwheels, and even spin his sword depending on how far the enemy is and what the enemy is doing. It is awesome and I never got tired of it. The enemies animations aren’t that great but you’re mostly looking at Geralt in action that it really didn’t make a difference. Even writing about it makes me want to play the game over again just to fight enemies as Geralt.

The atmosphere of this game is amazing. Characters are doing their own things and talking about their own lives. When rain falls, everyone starts talking about how wet it is or how it doesn’t fall as much where they come from. There is not much to do in towns except walking around and talking with others so it really helps that they have their own things going on. The graphics, locations, characters, story, and the combat made Witcher 2 a game that is really worth playing. I highly recommend playing it on a nice PC as the graphics really add to the experience. If not the PC, at least the Xbox 360 version just to get a sense of what this game is all about. I had a great experience with it and I hope to do it again with difference choices the next play through.

Walking Dead Episode 1 Finished!

The Walking Dead game is my first adventure game that I have beaten fully from the developer Telltale game. The reason I don’t finish most adventure games is that they get really repetitive throughout it’s short episodes. You’re walking around and talking with everyone while trying to click everywhere that looks intractable. The Walking Dead is similar to this concept but they also throw in some actions sequences to keep you interested. Even some puzzles made sense compare to other Telltale games. It felt like the puzzles were part of the story instead of just some random puzzle the game throws at you. Even though I love the changes that Telltale has made for this game, it is still not perfect.

A lot of things about this game kept me interested to keep playing. The voice acting for one is pretty close to perfect. The characters are all very thought out and they all feel like characters that could exist in the Walking Dead universe. Sure some of them are cliche of any zombie movies/games but I mean it makes sense to have them here. The main character, Lee, is a great addition since you’re playing someone entirely new. He’s somewhat like Samuel L. Jackson and he talks like him too. The way Telltale built up his character throughout this first episodic was pretty nice. You get to learn about his family and the stuff he did to get him to where he was at the start of the game.

The episodic nature also works for this game. I beat it in about 2 hours and I felt that it went by at a really nice pace. It didn’t feel like I was being rushed or the game was just bogging. 2 hours was enough for me to learn everything about the characters in the game. It is something that even the show doesn’t do well.

The gameplay was also a nice departure from the usual Telltale games. There are some quick time events not unlike Jurrasic Park but it makes more sense when it happens here than in that game. There are also some parts where all you had to do was move the reticle and press a button to do an action but I felt more impact given the circumstances. It adds some flavor to the usual walking around talking part of Telltale games. Telltale needs to add these features to it’s other adventure games to keep me interested in finishing an episode.

The game also have branching decisions which will supposedly change the story through the 5 episodes. There will be new characters and certain characters will die depending on your choices but some of the major story beats in the game will stay the same. Think of it like a diamond shape where you pick certain things and it branches out but eventually the characters will all end up at the same ending. It makes sense in a developer’s point as if they didn’t do it then they may have to create assets and stories that only 1 out of 10 people will see. It was also a nice touch that the trailer for the next episode reflects the choices that you made in the current episode.

The Walking Dead kept me interested throughout the whole episode and I believe it could keep me interested for all five episodes. As I said it isn’t perfect though. They are some parts of the story that didn’t make sense of why he was doing it. For one thing, the main character mentions “Walkers” and “Zombies” a couple of times which I don’t think those words exists in that universe. There are also some points in the story that I felt like a glitch might have happened because I had no idea what to do. It is a problem with all Telltale games since you just have to click everywhere to get everything. Sometimes I don’t see where I have to click and it makes me think that the game glitched up. Anyways aside from that this game is very worth playing for anyone interested in a good zombie game. They don’t even have to be interested in the Walking Dead universe. Though it does add nice touches when you already know who certain characters are.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started